Untitled
unknown
plain_text
20 days ago
90 kB
1
Indexable
Never
Introduction & Contents 0:05 [Music] 0:28 welcome to the third video we are doing here at ooby petras as with our previous video the first 0:33 half will be up for free on youtube while the entire video will be available to our subscribers on patreon 0:40 the generous support of our subscribers is what allows us to continue producing more content like this and at more regular 0:46 intervals why forge the deed to a house when you already own the house and have a valid 0:53 deed why forge a marriage certificate when you already have a real one to prove you 0:59 are lawfully married taken a step further if one were to forge papers of ordination 1:05 wouldn't that person be universally suspected of being an imposter no one sensible would go 1:11 through the trouble to forge documents if valid ones were available how much work is it to create a 1:17 convincing forgery to try to rewrite history and why would one go through with it 1:22 if the historical documentation already bears out the point you want to prove 1:27 a forgery especially a convincing one is a substantial amount of work and materials as well as detrimental to 1:34 one's reputation if caught creating forged materials the heavy amount of work needed to create a 1:40 forgery guarantees that one only goes to the trouble of forgery when real evidence is lacking and 1:46 because of this we can understand something of how the first millennium church interpreted and understood canonical literature and 1:53 papal writings based on the material some of its more unscrupulous and ambitious members 1:58 were willing to create for a lack of solid evidence in other words if all of those 2:03 statements from popes like saint galasios st leo the great saint hormistas and 2:09 saint gregory the great were understood to mean what satis cognitum and vatican 1 interpret them to mean 2:15 there would have been no need to forge thousands and thousands of pages of quotations 2:20 claiming what satis cognitum and pastor eternus claim this all looms large on the horizon 2:27 whenever a discussion emerges regarding the development of the papacy from amir cenotal head 2:33 who worked in concert and council with his fellow patriarchs all the way to a position of universal 2:38 autocracy with no enforceable limits some forgeries took nearly a millennium 2:44 to be exposed and several more centuries to be accepted as fakes but like the detonation of an explosive 2:50 the effects of the forgeries remain long after they lack potency in this video we will discuss the major 2:57 forgeries that slowly led to the great schism due to their initial influence upon the 9th century popes 3:03 and culminating with the gregorian reforms in the 11th century the first of these the samakian 3:08 forgeries also known as the pseudo-samakian forgeries of the late 5th and 6th centuries are 3:14 now recognized to be the first major forgeries in the genre that we are discussing those will be followed by the first five 3:21 centuries of biographies from the famous liber pontificalis a collection that slowly became more 3:27 reliable as time went by but was created as a piece of papal propaganda shortly after the reign of 3:33 pope simakis by his partisans following this we will delve into the mid to late 8th century document 3:40 the donation of constantine finally we will move on to the four part collection known under the title 3:46 the pseudo-isadore decreedles we will delve into how these forgeries were then utilized by the reformers in the 3:52 gregorian reform and appeared in the massively influential decretium gratiani 3:58 which formed a backbone of roman catholic canon law for centuries as well as how a roman catholic saint 4:04 such as thomas aquinas bought into and recycled these forgeries in his papally commissioned polemic work 4:11 against the errors of the greeks not stopping there we will discuss the appearance of these 4:16 forgeries even in the catechism of the catholic church and current code of canon law for the 4:22 catholic church with that we begin part 1 The Pseudo-Symmachian Forgeries 4:27 the pseudo-symmachian forgeries on november 16th 498 a.d pope anastasios ii 4:35 a sympathizer with the byzantine emperor's policy on the henotikon died in his two years as pope he had 4:42 created a controversial legacy by re-entering communion with pro-henoticon clergy 4:47 during the acacian schism and therefore causing a large faction in rome to decline communion from the pope 4:54 six days after his death on november 22 the city of rome elected two popes the 5:01 first a deacon of sardinian and probably pagan origin simakus was elected by the faction that 5:07 had broken with the previous pope anastasius ii the second elected later that day by the 5:13 pro-byzantine faction was the arch priest laurentius whose father had also been a priest 5:19 and unlike the sardinian deacon had roots within rome violence immediately erupted but the two 5:26 factions agreed to submit to the arbitration of theodoric the austrogothic king theodoric 5:33 perhaps motivated by political considerations ordered samakos should be kept as pope 5:38 because he had been elected prior to laurentius and by a larger faction what followed 5:44 next was a series of four synods related to the papal election the first was held by pope simakus in 5:50 march 499 and seems to have created peace by offering laurentius another sea 5:56 the second synod was held in arminium in 501 when theodoric the goth ordered the pope 6:02 there to stand trial after he was accused of celebrating easter on the wrong day upon arrival in arminium he learned he 6:09 was also under investigation for corruption and an alleged affair with a nun pope 6:14 simakus forsaking common sense made the least intelligent decision he could have 6:20 and instead of standing trial before the judge who had previously shown him favor ran away to rome in reaction 6:27 the pro-laurentian faction reasserted laurentius's claim to the papal throne and dragged him back to the eternal city 6:35 the situation became so hideous that in 502 a.d theodoric appointed a 6:40 new bishop peter of altineum as locum tenons of rome until a new synod would decide between samakus 6:47 and laurentius that proposed synod the third one took place shortly after easter 502 6:53 and was presided over by the bishops of ravenna milan and aquilea but it fell apart when peter 7:00 of altineum the locum tenens of rome arrived at the council by order of king theodoric 7:06 samakus enraged that the locum tenens had been installed in the first place 7:11 because it insinuated sumakus was not the real pope refused to cooperate and violence 7:16 erupted theodoric then ordered a second session to be held on september 1st 7:21 502 which resulted in more riots and further loss of life due to this simakus barricaded himself 7:29 within saint peter's church outside the city walls while the faction of laurentius seized all of the churches inside the 7:35 city of rome the third session of the third synod was held in the middle of september 502 7:42 and decided they could not stand in judgment of the pope as he was pope while the fourth session 7:48 of the third synod was held at palma on october 23 502 and ruled that all allegations against 7:55 samakus should be dropped the records of both these councils are highly suspect but if the records are 8:01 accurate the synods themselves were clearly and severely influenced by these forgeries 8:07 this is clear because had actual documentation existed demonstrating the first sea could not be 8:12 judged there would have been no need to risk one's reputation and standing to invent it 8:18 despite these synods the laurentians just went about what they were doing and continued to hold the churches in 8:24 the city of rome while simakus was barricaded inside saint peter's outside of rome itself it was not until 8:31 either 506 or 507 a.d that the aryan theodoric the goth 8:36 in the midst of a dispute with the byzantines took an anti-byzantine stance and sent an official to remove the 8:42 nearly 30 churches within the city of rome from the pro-byzantine laurentians and handed them over to samakus that the 8:49 schism effectively ended quote for four years lawrence held the 8:54 lateran and all the roman churches except saint peter's while sumakus was confined by street violence as a 9:01 prisoner in the vatican it was only because by 506 theodoric was 9:06 taking an anti-eastern political stand that he ordered the surrender of all the churches in rome to samakus 9:12 lawrence tactfully withdrew end quote laurentius then retired to a farm owned 9:19 by a senator who had been his patron where he lived peacefully in prayer and fasting until his death 9:25 to bolster his position during the conflict with his rival laurentius the partisans of samakhus and perhaps 9:31 samakus himself created a series of four main forgeries claiming prior precedent to essentially 9:37 put him as pope above the law as the catholic encyclopedia states in its article on 9:44 pope simakus quote the object of these forgeries was to produce alleged instances from earlier times to 9:51 support the whole procedure of the adherence of samakus and in particular the position that the 9:56 roman bishop could not be judged by any court composed of other bishops end quote 10:02 in his work the invention of peter professor george democopolis states as much when he explains 10:08 quote what makes these texts partisan within that pro-papal context is that they narrate the trials and 10:15 tribulations of past papal sovereigns through thinly veiled comparisons to samakos's own troubles 10:21 but they always do so in a way that both reinforces papal autonomy and exonerates simakus end quote 10:28 he adds quote the pro-samakian party produced during the height of the controversy a number of imagined papal 10:36 biographies that either related directly to the charges against sumacus or hoped to insulate him further by 10:42 offering legendary accounts that emphasized the authority and autonomy of peter's successors 10:47 although the stories are very different in content they contain a series of interrelated theses concerning the 10:53 inability of anyone whether lay or ecclesiastic to judge the bishop of rome 10:58 they also offer specific justifications for many of the accusations recently lodged against sumakus 11:05 thus the heroes of these papal biographies all serve as proxies for samakian interests and demonstrate a 11:12 new form of papal rhetoric born in the traditions of the hegemonic claims of the petrine toppos 11:17 end quote in other words with each incident recorded in the life of pope simakus in the liber pontificalis 11:24 there is a corresponding forgery meant to provide evidence as to why he should be acquitted and 11:30 this is no coincidence and the first segment of the liber pontaficalis was written during this time 11:36 this is why the primary editor of the first critical edition of the lieber the catholic priest father louis 11:42 duchenne was also the primary editor of the first critical edition of the samakian 11:48 forgeries now during this period four main forgeries were created by the partisans 11:53 of symmachus entitled justa liberi justa cinodi sinoessene de marcelino 12:00 constitutum silvestri and justa de percutione zesti et polychrony accusatione 12:07 professor demicopoulos summarizes each of the four forgeries in his book the invention of peter as follows quote 12:15 the gestali berry for example tells an apocryphal story of how pope liberius 12:20 was exiled from rome by the heretical emperor constantius when easter approached and it was time 12:26 for the pontiff to perform his annual baptism of catechumens the citizens of rome came to him on the 12:32 outskirts of the city so he could perform the ritual in an austen cemetery 12:37 not only does this text provide a papal precedent for performing baptisms outside of the 12:42 city as symachus was doing at st peter's and claim that the orthodox catechumens of rome would seek to be baptized by the 12:49 authentic pope it also emphasizes that liberius had performed these baptisms on the very 12:54 same site that saint peter had performed baptisms when he was the bishop of rome in other words the justa lee berry 13:01 carefully makes a narrative link between the baptisms of the historic peter a previously exiled but holy pope and 13:08 sumakus who was at that time performing baptisms in the church that housed the relics of saint peter 13:14 end quote symmachus barred from entering the city by the laurentians 13:20 is forced to hold the yearly baptism of catechumens outside the city at a shrine and not in 13:25 the city's main cathedral so a precedent was invented to explain why this was not only acceptable 13:31 but preferable but it does not stop there quote in another of the samakian 13:36 apocrypha the cenote sinusoine gesta we find a fictional tale of how pope marcellinus 13:43 had been brought to a trial by a local synod for having offered incense to pagan idols during the diocletian persecution 13:50 at the moment when the synod was about to pass judgment against the pope a miraculous voice was heard by all to 13:56 proclaim prima cedes known you decapitor aquaculum the first sea will not be judged by 14:03 anyone here again papal biography serves as a narrative weapon to 14:08 insulate samakus from his enemies namely the first synod of 502 which had been ordered by theodoric to 14:15 evaluate the charges against sumakus the biography invents the account of a divine voice proclaiming papal 14:21 sovereignty because the reality of the present circumstances demonstrates just how limited sumaku's authority 14:28 really was end quote you will remember that at the second and third sessions of the third 14:34 synod mentioned above it was decided that the pope could not be judged what almost certainly occurred was 14:41 either the synod acts or themselves forgeries which is possible or the synod was simply working off of 14:47 the forgeries themselves and believed them to be authentic the reason it is one of either two of those 14:53 options is synods make decisions based on prior precedent and as mentioned there would be no 14:59 reason to create forgeries had there been real prior historical precedent for what those forgeries were 15:05 claiming in other words why forge the deed to a house when you already own the house but not 15:12 satisfied with just one forgery proclaiming the bishop of rome to be above the law the forgers doubled down on it and 15:18 created a fictitious synod led by pope saint sylvester issuing 20 cannons and stating emphatically 15:25 that the pope cannot be judged as demicopoulos states quote in the constitution 15:31 silvestri yet another narrative proxy for somakian concerns we find a similar injunction nemo enum 15:38 de judicet no one indeed can judge the first c 15:44 which is designed to insulate the papacy from both secular and rival ecclesiastical interferences 15:50 in this case the decree is put in canonical form authorized by hundreds of bishops pope 15:56 sylvester and the emperor constantine the text maintains that a cleric can be accused 16:02 only by a peer meaning a bishop can be accused only by another bishop not by a priest or deacon and that the 16:09 pope can be accused by no one the text also stresses the importance of celebrating easter in 16:15 unity and emphasizes the pope's role in determining the date of easter as with the other texts these matters 16:22 relate directly to samakian concerns and offer a counter narrative to laurentian accusations and samakian 16:29 humiliations end quote as pointed out earlier zamakus had been summoned by theodoric 16:36 in 502 to answer accusations that he had celebrated easter on the wrong day 16:41 using an older roman calculation he had actually celebrated it about a month prior to laurentius 16:47 who was using the eastern or nicene calculation but you do not need calculations when 16:53 the pope himself can simply determine the date and everyone must simply obey again 16:59 if there were actual historical precedents for the first sea not being judged by anyone why were 17:05 these not brought up as evidence why was forgery immediately resorted to 17:10 the reason is because there were no historical precedents for it 17:16 it should be noted that this statement the first c can be judged by no one first appears 17:22 in the samakian forgeries despite claims that the same theme is found in pope saint galacious shortly 17:28 before an inspection of his letters do not reveal anything like it as galacious is concerned was papaly 17:34 ratified ecumenical councils being overturned the statement the first c can be judged 17:40 by no one is then repeated in the pseudo-izadore de creedels the lieber pontificalis and then in 17:47 various canonical collections to the point that it is part of roman catholic canon law to this very day 17:54 at title 1404 as davis notes in the introduction to his translation 17:59 of the first eight centuries of lives in the liber pontificales quote this material was forged about 502 18:06 to support samakos's claim to the papacy against that of lawrence by producing with other matters 18:13 historical precedence for the claim that councils were not competent to pronounce judgment on the incumbent 18:19 of christendom's first sea simakis's refusal to accede to the council which attempted to depose him 18:25 could thus be justified the principle enunciated prima cedes animene yudicator would be 18:32 of considerable interest to later canon lawyers and the libre pontificalis is our proof 18:38 that within a generation these forgeries had come to be accepted as genuine history 18:43 end quote another accusation brought against symmachus that was to be addressed by the synod 18:49 held by theodore the goth in 502 at romanium and before simakus ran away prior to 18:54 defending himself was that he had been corrupt in his handling of church property 18:59 and that he had been romantically involved with a nun democracy summarizes it thus quote 19:06 in some cases the narratives of the samakian apocrypha are so similar to the accusations against 19:11 samakus that one wonders if they ever fooled anyone the gesta dexisti pregation for example 19:18 notes that pope sixtus iii had been accused by wealthy roman landowners of poorly 19:24 managing church property and of having an adulterous affair with a nun during the trial that exonerates 19:30 sixtus a trial in which the emperor valentinian iii presides accompanied by the entire senate and 19:36 clergy of rome the body of the council once again refuses to pass judgment on the pontifex 19:42 but more important the bishop of rome is made to be the emperor's proxy to literally sit on his chair and to 19:49 serve as the city's leading moral and legal constituted authority in his absence 19:54 end quote the samakian forgeries proved to be popular and rapidly spread the statement 20:01 that the first see is judged by no one suddenly showed up during this time and in the writings of 20:07 two saints anodius pavia and avitus of vienne they were both 20:12 influenced by what they thought were genuine works but were in fact recent fabrications and simply parroted 20:19 erik ibarra makes a big to-do about this in an article on his blog entitled the first c is judged by no one 20:26 historical and critical review of bishop athanasius schneider's op-ed for rarati kali mr ibarra 20:34 gets these from thomas william ayles's work the sea of peter in that article the quotation appears as 20:40 this quote god perchance has willed to terminate the causes of other men 20:45 by means of men but the prelate of that roman sea he has reserved without question to his 20:51 own judgment it is his will that the successors of the blessed apostle peter 20:56 should owe their innocence to heaven alone and should manifest a pure conscience to the inquisition of the 21:02 most severe judge god do you answer such will be the condition of all souls in that 21:07 scrutiny i retort that to one was said thou art peter 21:12 and upon this rock i will build my church and again that by the voice of the holy 21:18 pontiffs the dignity of his sea has been made venerable in the whole world since all the faithful everywhere are 21:24 submitted to it and it is marked out as the head of the whole body end quote thus says saint anodius 21:32 mr ibarra then follows with what is actually several snippets pasted together and not actually an entire quotation 21:39 from a letter by saint avitus of vien on the same topic quote we were in a 21:44 state of anxiety and alarm about the cause of the roman church inasmuch as we felt that our order the 21:50 episcopate of gaul was endangered by an attack upon its head what license for accusation against the 21:57 headship of the universal church ought to be allowed as a roman senator and a christian bishop 22:03 i conjure you that the state of the church be not less precious to you than that of the commonwealth if you 22:09 judge the matter with your profound consideration not merely is that cause which was examined 22:14 at rome to be contemplated but as if in the case of other bishops any danger be incurred 22:20 it can be repaired so if the pope of the city be put into question not a single bishop but the episcopate 22:27 itself will appear to be in danger he who rules the lord's fold will render an account how he 22:34 administers the care of the lambs he entrusted to him but it belongs not to the flock to alarm its own shepherd 22:41 but to the judge god wherefore restored to us if it be not yet restored 22:47 concord in our chief end quote mr ibarra then finishes with a quotation that 22:53 in the work by ales is claimed to be from the council of 499 but the citation in monzi says 22:59 immediately at the top that it is from the so-called palma synod which was the fourth session of 23:05 the third synod held in october 502 as can be seen on the screen mr ibarra 23:11 continues quote the person samakus who was attacked ought himself to have called 23:16 the council knowing that to his sea in the first place the rank or chief ship of the apostle peter 23:23 and then the authority of venerable councils following out the lord's command had committed a power without its like 23:29 in the churches nor would a precedent be easily found to show that in a similar matter the prelate of the aforementioned sea 23:36 had been subject to the judgment of his inferiors end quote two of these three statements were 23:41 written after the council and the third was from the final council in 502 a.d the one in which the locum tenens 23:47 appeared and sumachus refused to cooperate by that time the accusations against 23:53 sumakus were nearly three years old in those three years the pseudo-samakian 23:58 forgeries had more than enough time to spread throughout central italy influencing bishops in their wake after 24:05 a long quotation from trevor jollins mr ibarra continues and expresses 24:11 quote those who forged these samakian documents were appealing to even earlier centuries 24:16 where popes were deemed above the judgment of all inferiors but they are held by historians to be 24:22 spurious accounts i've not done any extensive studies on any particular claim of these 24:27 end quote but this begs the same question we asked at the beginning of the video 24:33 if you already own a house why forge the deed to it if popes were deemed above all judgment 24:40 of inferiors in earlier centuries why not just quote those documents why 24:46 forge brand new ones and then not appeal to the older ones you are claiming are there 24:51 at no point in the samakian controversy did anyone appeal to anything said by popes like saint leo or saint galasios 24:59 precisely because anything those saints may have said concerning papal octoritus 25:04 never indicated to their contemporaries that the pope was above judgment instead it took forgeries to 25:11 create that impression the samakian forgeries though were part of a much larger and much more 25:17 involved effort to reinvent the papacy and were an initial piece in what was growing to become a 25:23 propaganda war within rome itself part two The Liber Pontificalis 25:28 the lieber pontificalis much of the scholarship on the libre-pontificalis 25:33 dates to the late 1800s and early 1900s when the french catholic priest father 25:39 louis duchenne created the first critical edition of it and as mentioned previously 25:44 father duchenne's interest in the libra was closely tied to his interest in the samakian forgeries 25:49 because they were born out of the same events and same desires that is asserting papal autonomy 25:56 now the first section of the libre-pontificalis is essentially just an imaginative creation 26:01 of the first five centuries of papal history but created in the immediate wake of the somakian laurentian schism 26:08 in the early 6th century as democracy notes quote if there was anything that the 26:14 papal propagandists learned during the somakian laurentian schism it was how the production of papal 26:20 biographies especially those that could be carefully linked to saint peter were an effective means of maintaining a 26:26 narrative of papal hegemony in the face of empirical evidence to the contrary end quote 26:33 in addition quote one of the key features of the liber pontificalis 26:38 is its projection of papal sovereignty against all potential threats especially secular ones end quote 26:46 in other words the entire point of the libra was to rewrite history to make it look as though popes were not 26:52 as helpless and powerless as they really were in the 6th century but how do historians know the libra was 26:58 first composed in the very late 5th or early 6th centuries quote signs that the original author 27:04 has first-hand acquaintance with the events described begin only at the very end of the 5th 27:10 century the lives from leo the first to anastasius ii contain some curious models which are 27:16 best understood as material half remembered from oral tradition for instance the confused account of the council of 27:23 calcidon and 451 and the various references to the schism of acacius patriarch of constantinople 27:30 end quote but the authors got some of their information from previously existing lists of popes 27:35 some containing sparse historical data as well as information regarding the possessions of the church of rome and those 27:42 form the core of the leber from there the authors just improvised heavily and 27:48 filled in the biographical data in its article on the libre the catholic encyclopedia states 27:54 the compiler quote made use of two ancient catalogs or lists of the popes 28:00 taking from them the order of succession the chronological data and also certain historical notes these 28:07 lists were the so-called catalogues liberianus and a list of the popes that varies in 28:13 length in the manuscripts and perhaps depends on the catalogue librionus for the period before the middle of the 28:20 sixth century the catalogues liberianus is so called because it terminates with pope liberius 28:26 it has reached us in the so-called chronographus ani an ancient manuscript that contains the 28:32 valuable lists of the depositio martirum and the depositio episcoporum in the 28:38 catalogus libirijanus there are already short historical notices of some popes 28:43 peter pious pontianus fabianus cornelius lucius 28:50 sistus marcellinus and julius which were taken over by the author of 28:55 the lieber pontificalis for its list of the earliest popes the catalagus liberianus 29:02 was able to draw on the papal catalogue given by hippolytus of rome in his liber genera tionus though even 29:09 this list is not the oldest list of popes it is probable that from the beginning of the second century there was already 29:16 a list of popes which contained short historical notices and was afterwards continued end quote one of those 29:23 pre-existing corpuses the compiler can refer back to is the samakian forgeries 29:28 speaking of the influence of them on the compiler of the libre davis writes quote our compiler inserts 29:34 material from them with no discernible polemical motive at what he will have believed were the 29:39 historically correct points in the lives of the 4th century marcelinus and sylvester hence the 29:46 fictitious councils held under sylvester depicted in the murals at san sebastiano 29:51 on the via appia outside of rome and in that of chistus iii 29:56 the forged material contains various disciplinary canons supposed to have been passed by church 30:02 councils the libra pontificalis is quite prepared to wrench these from their already 30:07 fictitious context and scatter them on no apparent principle through a large number of the 30:12 lives in addition he seems to have had more material of this kind not known to us or invented by himself 30:20 this he treats in the same way the result is that no material of this kind in the libre-pontificalis 30:26 before the 6th century can be trusted unless confirmed elsewhere end quote davis 30:33 not phased by what most would consider bald-faced lying takes a much more lighthearted and 30:38 humorous view of the libra's early authors and their willingness to lie saying quote 30:44 there is no point in deploring the mendacity of a compiler who is prepared to invent material 30:50 to fill the lives before his own time we should rather be thankful that he gave the lead to the continuators 30:56 who would preserve analogous and genuine information in the later lives the historian thus has to discount a 31:03 great deal of fiction in the earliest parts of the libra pontificalis but the material retains its value for 31:09 bringing us into contact with beliefs held in the early 6th century by those of no great learning 31:16 with the developments taking place in the genre of hegeographical literature and with the working methods of a 31:21 chronicler at that time end quote the libra though forms a basis for later forgeries 31:27 in that it creates the outline for the decretals in the pseudo-isidore quote and the false decreetles 31:34 themselves owe some of their inspiration and material to the libra pontificalis it is no 31:39 coincidence that the consular dates assigned in them to fictitious early papal letters are only genuine when the councils are 31:46 mentioned in the libre-pontificalis end quote part 3 The Donation of Constantine 31:53 the donation of constantine sometime in the mid-8th century perhaps 31:58 no later than 760 a.d an anonymous cleric either at the lateran in rome 32:04 or in the kingdom of the franks penned a two-part forgery this forgery depicted in 13th century 32:10 painting in the chapel of saint sylvester in the church of the four crowned saints in rome is probably the most famous of all 32:17 forgeries in church history and is known as the donation of constantine the catholic encyclopedia states quote 32:25 it is addressed by constantine to pope sylvester the first and consists of two parts in the first 32:31 entitled confessio the emperor relates how he was instructed in the christian faith by 32:36 sylvester makes a full profession of faith and tells of his baptism in rome by that 32:41 pope and how he was thereby cured of leprosy in the second part the donatio constantine is made to 32:48 confer on sylvester and his successors the following privileges and possessions the pope as successor of saint peter has 32:56 the primacy over the four patriarchs of antioch alexandria constantinople and jerusalem 33:03 also over all the bishops in the world the lateran basilica at rome built by 33:09 constantine shall surpass all churches as their head similarly the churches of saint peter 33:15 and saint paul shall be endowed with rich possessions moreover 33:20 the emperor makes a present to the pope and his successors of the lateran palace of rome and the provinces districts and 33:28 towns of italy and all the western regions the document goes on to say that for himself 33:34 the emperor has established in the east a new capital which bears his name and fever he removes his government 33:40 since it is inconvenient that a secular emperor have power where god has established the residence 33:46 of the head of the christian religion the document concludes with maledictions against all who dare to violate 33:52 these donations and with the assurance that the emperor has signed them with his own hand and placed them on the tomb of saint 33:59 peter this document is without a doubt a forgery fabricated somewhere between the years 34:05 750 and 850 a.d it is so clearly a fabrication that 34:10 there is no reason to wonder that with the revival of historical criticism in the 15th century 34:16 the true character of the document was at once recognized end quote 34:22 the sources for the documents are clear as the same section of the catholic encyclopedia notes 34:27 quote the narrative of the conversion and healing of the emperor is based on the apocryphal 34:33 acts of sylvester acta or justa silvestri yet all the particulars of the donatzio 34:39 narrative do not appear in the hitherto known text of that legend the distinctions conferred on the pope 34:45 and the cardinals of the roman church the forger probably invented and described according to certain 34:51 contemporary rites and the court ceremonial of the roman and byzantine emperors 34:56 the author also used the biographies of the popes in the libra pontaficalis likewise 8th century letters of the 35:02 popes especially in his account of the imperial donations end quote while the location of its 35:09 creation is speculated to be either the frankish kingdom or the city of rome itself and 35:15 compelling arguments can be made for each place the anonymous author is completely lost 35:20 to history the main argument behind the document being from the frankish realm is that it first appears there the main 35:27 argument behind the document being a roman invention is the papacy being the main benefactor of the forgery 35:34 as well as a desire by the papacy to reclaim papal holdings the franks had conquered from the lombards 35:39 who in turn had taken them from the popes no consensus has been reached regardless 35:45 nonetheless the documents soon took hold and appeared in canonical collections even in the east 35:51 with noted eastern canonists such as balsamon and blastaris considering it legitimate 35:57 and saint mark of ephesus considering it so as well no doubt balsamin blastares and others were 36:03 influenced to do so by the logic behind the donatio the emperor had given primacy to rome 36:10 because it was the head of the empire so the emperor could and did give primacy to constantinople 36:15 as first rome had been reckoned to have fallen away leaving only constantinople or new rome 36:21 as the sole inheritor of church leadership the donatio had such widespread 36:26 influence that it was quoted in a long passage by the gregorian reformer pope leo the ninth to michael carolarius 36:33 in 1054 as part of the argument as to why kellarius should kowtow to rome 36:39 it also appears often in an altered form in many manuscripts of the pseudo-izadore de creedels 36:45 and is even quoted within the decretals the work was so influential that when papam met the pope he 36:52 dismounted and led the pope's horse on foot as that is what constantine has claimed to have done in the acta silvestri and 36:59 donatio scenes from the donatio is painted in the chapel of saint sylvester 37:04 in the church of the four crowned saints in rome as well as again in the old saint peter's hall of constantine 37:09 pictured here and painted by giulio romano who had been a student of the famous painter and architect rafael 37:17 now the document is not long it is actually fairly short combined the two parts run only about 10 37:24 pages and a link to them can be found in the video description below figures as early as the holy roman 37:31 emperor otto iii in the 10th century as well as nicholas of cusa in the 13th century 37:37 john of torcamada in the 15th century and erasmus of rotterdam in the 16th 37:42 century had all expressed doubts about it but it was not until the year 1440 a.d 37:48 that renaissance humanist priest and scholar of classics lorenzo vala put forward the first 37:54 argument formally demonstrating the text to be a forgery via linguistic historical and textual 38:00 analysis and entitled it de falso 38:07 or discourse on the forgery of the alleged donation of constantine vala's book was put on the index of 38:14 forbidden books by the catholic church but later voices such as the roman catholic baronis in the 16th century 38:21 further forwarded vala's conclusions as the quotations above demonstrate the catholic church now regards the work 38:28 as a forgery part 4 the pseudo-isidore de creedels The Pseudo-Isidorian Decretals 38:35 despite the donation of constantine being the most famous work of forgery it is not necessarily the most 38:40 influential that would go to the pseudo-izadore de creedels more commonly known as the false 38:46 decreedles though many works have been written on the false decretals among them the very 38:51 popular book by e.h davenport entitled rather unimaginatively the false decreedles a tremendous amount 38:59 of scholarship on them has been done since davenport published his work in 1916 39:04 and so the work we will be quoting from most extensively in this section is papal letters in the 39:10 early middle ages by detlev jasper and horst furman published in 2001. furman considered to be the 39:17 world's expert on the pseudo-izadorian decretals until his death in 2011 at the age of 85 39:23 was a medievalist and professor at the university of tubingen and the university of regensburg as well 39:29 as the president of the prestigious monumenta germane historica from 1971 to 1994 39:36 and president of the bavarian academy of sciences the austrian academy of sciences 39:41 the academy de inscription et beller and the medieval academy of america as 39:47 well as being a fellow of the british academy his voluminous writings on the topic 39:52 originally in german have slowly made their way into english and have formed the foundation for all 39:57 the recent work on the false decretals unlike the donation of constantine to 40:02 which no clue concerning the author's identity remain and heavy debate rages concerning the place of composition 40:08 for the false decretals various identities have been floated but more as a compiler and organizer of 40:14 the project than an actual scribe and these typically focus around various habits 40:19 such as pascasius radbertus but the location of the majority of the composition 40:24 is largely settled on the monastery at corby in north central france while the date of composition is almost 40:31 certainly between 847 and 852 a.d as for why it was done furman states 40:38 the academic consensus quote the most widely accepted opinion today holds that the forger or forgers are to 40:45 be sought in the circle of the adherences of or the opponents to hinkmar of reams and 40:51 that all so-called pseudo-izadorian forgeries originated at one place in the western frankish realm or in 40:58 connection with it end quote now the earliest traces of them are in 852 41:04 when they go of trier attempted to claim the role of primate over the other metropolitans 41:09 an office created by pseudo isidore again in 852 we see hinkmar of reams 41:16 gathering his clergy into council or promulgating statutes two of which are from the pseudo-isidore 41:22 from there popularity for the false decretals spread rapidly throughout gaul before winding up as far as can be told 41:30 directly in rome with little to no indication they appeared anywhere else prior to their discrete adoption 41:36 and usage by rome in the 860s though early polemics placed the composition solely in the lap of rome 41:43 the impetus for their creation seems fairly clear and that the rule of law had broken down in the frankish kingdoms 41:49 particularly under louis the pious it should be understood that under frankish inheritance laws 41:55 all property was equally divided among sons meaning that when a king died suddenly several successor states arose 42:02 out of the former unity and more often than not they began fighting one another 42:08 added into this major viking raids had begun in 841 with the sack of ruon and again in 845 42:15 with the siege of paris quote one speaks of the period after charlemagne as that of the dissolution 42:21 of the empire the central authority dwindled fragmentary realms arose 42:27 the insecurity of rights became a preoccupation and legal structures were increasingly being destroyed by the incursions of the 42:34 northmen powerful secular rulers on all levels intervened rigorously in ecclesiastic 42:40 organizations alienating the property of the church between 818 and 845 bishops in significant numbers 42:48 were deposed or driven from their seas and secular judges tried clerics in criminal trials 42:54 reforming synods achieved little with their calls for reform and no improvement could have been expected 42:59 after the breakup of the empire in 843 even the chief instrument of secular legislation the capitularies 43:06 which were supposed to have effect in the entire empire had grown weak end quote 43:13 another commentator the one of far less repute than furman and writing in the early 1900s e.h 43:19 davenport adds quote in those recurrent civil wars whenever a bishop found himself upon the 43:26 losing side he was inevitably robbed by the winning side moreover priests were sometimes murdered 43:32 and bishops often falsely accused and condemned by secular not ecclesiastical tribunals there was 43:39 as little respect for the church's servants as for its property end quote 43:44 the church men desperate to see the halt to the slaughter and kangaroo courts their fellow clerics were regularly put 43:50 through in the midst of what sounds like utter chaos and social upheaval invented the decretals in such 43:56 situations it is normal for an all-encompassing nostalgia for the simpler times to develop 44:02 and as the forgers had no real source for such nostalgia they simply invented it quote the 44:08 pseudo-izadorian forgeries are often placed in the context of a reform effort arising from a world awash with legal 44:15 uncertainty they concerned themselves with far more than ecclesiastical jurisdiction 44:20 they wrote about the liturgy the sacraments and marital law further sketching an image of the vita 44:26 primitiva which has been called a vision of a church in a golden age end quote in addition to the chaos 44:34 coming directly from the civil wars the power of the metropolitans was stifling to the point that all other 44:40 bishops were simply the metropolitan's lackeys davenport comments quote charlemagne 44:46 in reviving the old canon law which was replete with rules for the rights and duties of the metropolitan archbishop 44:53 may have given new life to the order itself but he was too autocratic to allow the 44:58 metropolitans to become powerful it was not until the weekly rule of louis the pious 45:04 that they found an opportunity for self-aggrandizement after which their rise to power was 45:09 rapid by the middle of the 9th century immediately prior to the false decreedles 45:14 they had become the life and soul of their provinces the two jurisdictions of synod and 45:20 metropolitan tended to merge the one within the other end quote the reason 45:25 for this was simple the metropolitans were appointed by the local civil authority and were therefore hard-pressed to go 45:32 against the decisions of the person to whom they owed their appointment if they did the result would be ugly 45:38 this meant that when a local ruler took issue with a bishop the metropolitan would likely take the 45:43 side of the local ruler while the bishop would be put through a kangaroo court the bishops in the eyes of the forgers 45:50 were the real victims as figureheads of ecclesiastical power the bishops were soon sold out by their 45:56 metropolitans from above while simultaneously being subverted by the chore episcopy from below 46:02 the forgers though had a solution for this quote in pseudo-izadore the growth of papal 46:08 power served to protect the position of bishops indeed it was not the pope but the bishops who 46:14 were called the keys of the church according to an understanding of cyprian and for whose invulnerability 46:20 all were to cooperate the lord had granted to them the power of binding and loosing 46:25 accusations against them were no longer to be handled by provincial and national synods cases that touched upon their 46:32 prerogatives were called cause maeros and reserved to the pope who alone had the right to confirm the 46:38 decisions of the councils papal rights were stressed when used to defend the suffragan's bishops 46:44 end quote he later adds quote the fact that these protections were 46:49 reinforced by the newly created office of primate as well as through an extensive strengthening of papal power 46:55 can only be understood from the desire of the forger to restrict the privileges of the metropolitan with papal authority 47:01 to the advantage of the bishops end quote for the forageries of pseudo-isidore the 47:07 bishops would have immediate access to the pope a person independent of the frankish rulers in this way 47:14 the forgers were able to remove the frankish rulers from the situation in an attempt to restore independence to 47:19 the local bishops that is as long as the pope was impartial further 47:24 as mentioned earlier when referring to thegoad of trier the false decreetals create a new office 47:29 above the metropolitan that of the primate and they state that in the largest city of each old roman 47:36 province the bishop there was to be named the primate and he would rule over the metropolitans and keep them 47:42 in check but in the minds of the forgers even the office of primate could be overruled by the pope of rome 47:49 pseudo-izadore also has an axe to grind with the chore episcopy whom he sees as contenders and 47:55 underminers of bishops which is why he relegates the chore episcopy to the rank of simple priests 48:00 thus nullifying the competition the lengths the forgers went to protect a bishop were stunning 48:06 quote a significant goal of the forgeries was to protect suffragin's bishops from intervention by the metropolitans 48:13 the provincial synods or the secular power trial procedure and the possibility of deposing bishops 48:20 are rendered immeasurably difficult for example no layman no subject no alien or freed 48:26 man no one who is an enemy of the bishop no one infamous could accuse the bishop particularly not 48:33 before a secular court end quote if an accusation were made against a bishop 48:39 it would take no less than 72 witnesses to condemn the bishop further at any point in the 48:44 investigation and trial the accused bishop could appeal to the pope who could overrule the current trial 48:50 and then set up his own this contradicts the sardican cannons which state that a bishop can only 48:55 appeal to rome after the verdict is given further according to the canons of sartica 49:02 rome's role was purely as a review court deciding whether or not the appeal deserved to be heard 49:08 if the answer was yes then the appeal would have to be sent to a province adjacent to the condemned bishop's own 49:14 province and be heard by bishops there perhaps with roman clerics joining the judges 49:19 another step pseudo isidore takes is known as the exceptio spoilie meaning that when a bishop is deposed 49:26 they cannot have their property taken from them nor can they be removed from their sea or imprisoned until rome has ruled on it 49:33 this however is not in the sardican canons at all which simply states that a bishop who appeals to rome 49:39 cannot be replaced by another bishop until rome has rejected his appeal or that the appeals court in the 49:46 adjacent province has twice condemned him now though we refer to pseudo-izadore as 49:52 he it was not just one forger who created the forgeries commonly known under the appellative pseudo-izadore 49:59 this was a concerted effort that required a team or perhaps several teams operating under the direction of a head 50:05 or committee as furman notes quote the vast extant and skilled preparation make it unlikely 50:12 that a single person created the forgeries instead we must assume a circle of forgers with access to a rich 50:19 library producing and distributing products of highly various types end quote furthermore what we call the 50:26 collection of forgeries commonly called pseudo-izadore is actually a group of forgeries 50:32 and it is the fourth part of these forgeries which is also the largest that is properly known as pseudo-isidore 50:38 due to that section's introduction claiming to be written by a certain isidore mercator 50:44 or isadore the merchant although there are manuscripts with the name written as 50:49 isidore peccator or isadore the sinner which has led some experts to believe 50:55 the appellative of mercator is purely a scribal error that simply gained ground 51:00 early on this isadore soon became associated with the 7th century bishop 51:06 saint isidore of seville for reasons that will be discussed later on but the collection commonly known as 51:12 pseudo-isidore is typically broken into four parts part 1 the collectio hispana gallica augusto 51:19 denensis part 2 the so-called capitula angel romney 51:24 part three the capitulary collection of benedictus levita and part four the 51:30 pseudo-isadorian decretals further evidence the forgeries were produced in the same place 51:36 or within a close vicinity and by teams answering to a head or a committee is that they appear in one another and 51:43 play off of one another as if they were all developed in conjunction being as each section of the 51:49 false decretals deserves its own description we will now delve into all four parts 51:54 the first section is known as the collectio hispana gallica augusto dunensis the spanish canon law 52:01 known as the collectio hispana began to circulate within frankish gaul and then became known as collectio 52:08 hispana gallica this then was used by the forgers who went through and edited it 52:13 both improving the latin occasionally removing cannons while adding others and adding to existing ones often times 52:20 through merging together different cannons and adding in small amounts of new material to make two or more cannons 52:27 appear as if they were discussing one cannon and the same topic thus giving a new meaning and intent to 52:34 said canons this new forged collection known as the collectio hispana gallica 52:40 augusto dunensis is the first of the four parts of the false decreetles 52:45 it should be noted that in the other three sections of the false decreetles whenever a writer cites cannons they are 52:51 recited from the forged hispana gallica augusto dunensis almost exclusively 52:57 the second section known as the capitula angel romney is named after bishop angoram of mets 53:04 and claims to be a letter sent to him by pope hadrian the first who died in 795 a.d and is therefore 53:11 also occasionally known as the capitula hadriani it is comprised of 71 or 72 sayings 53:18 that have been slightly adapted and is occupied with the question of how you deal with accusations against the 53:23 episcopate quote a major source of the capitula anger romney 53:28 is roman law specifically in its visigothic redaction among others this breviarium allora 53:35 sianum and its epitomi perisciences and agidi sentiente pauli but other sources are 53:42 the dionysio hydriana cassiodoruses historia tripartita 53:48 and other sources also drawn upon in the false to creedals end quote the third section called the 53:54 capitulary collection of benedictus levita also known as benedict the deacon 54:00 is a collection of three books and four additions and claims to be written by a deacon 54:05 benedict who is commissioned by archbishop otgar of mainz the compiler claims they found almost 54:11 all of their materials at the library at the church of mainz now about 25 of his material is actual 54:18 legitimate quotations with the other 75 percent being forgeries according to fuhrman the sources 54:24 consisted of quote the bible councils decreedles 54:30 roman law germanic codes penitentials writings of the fathers of the church 54:35 more recent theological writings the dionysio hadriana irish canon 54:41 collections and so on on the whole the circle of sources is smaller but in some cases 54:47 he used a broader body of material than the forgers of the pseudo-izadorian decretals drew upon 54:52 for example besides a series of synods that are not exploited in the false decreedles he used the breviatio canonum of 55:00 falgentius ferondus the collectio vetus gallica from which he took early frankish councils 55:06 extensive roman legal sources and capitula episcoporum which were surprisingly omitted by the 55:13 pseudo-isadorian decretals end quote the fourth and final section of the false decretals 55:19 is the pseudo-isidore de creedels and using the liber pontificalis as their backdrop the forgers were 55:25 trying to fill in the blanks quote the libre pontificalis in particular is exploited as a historical guide 55:32 insofar as pseudo-izadore creates decreedles for popes on the basis of the entries which he finds here 55:38 on the activities of individual popes and fills those to creedles with his constructions end quote 55:45 in other words when the libra pontificalis states a council was held by pope x in year y pseudo-izadore creates the 55:53 decrees of this council when the leber mentions pope x also wrote a letter to bishop z 55:58 pseudo-izadore creates said letter using snippets from the sources listed above 56:04 taking this into account it can be broken down as follows decretals from clement the first to 56:10 melchiottis consisting of 60 decretals of which 58 are forgeries from 30 popes 56:17 making up more than 220 pages these are followed by a treatise 56:22 entitled on the primitive church and the synod of nicaea and then a reworked version of the 56:28 constitutum constantini as found in the donation of constantine 56:33 followed by three shorter forgeries on nicaea and canons from 54 councils with copious reworking and outright 56:40 forgeries mixed in throughout finally several dozen papal decretals and decrees of councils consisting of 33 56:47 popes from the time of pope sylvester to pope gregory ii of this collection 36 decretals and 56:54 decrees are forgeries a further discussion on this can be found in pages 161 57:00 through 169 in jasper and furman's work entitled papal letters in the early medieval ages 57:07 quote the false decreedles comprehend primarily papal letters and councils from clement 57:12 the first and anacletus the first through gregory the first whose letters 57:17 are followed by the roman council of gregory ii in 721 a.d of all the medieval canon law 57:24 collections arranged in chronological order the pseudo-izadorian decretals were the most 57:29 widely distributed work being even more widely distributed than the dionysio hadriana end quote 57:36 not even the canonical collection of dionysius exegus which was commissioned by pope saint 57:42 hermistus and given the papal stamp of approval was as widely and as intensely circulated as the canons of 57:48 pseudo-izadore not only was it circulated far and wide but the sources the forgers used were 57:54 vast quote through considerable portions pseudo isidore did not forge his 58:00 materials freely but rather composed them of highly varied often heavily edited excerpts the number 58:07 of these excerpts pieced together like a mosaic could have amounted to more than ten thousand among the sources 58:15 he extensively exploited were the bible extensively partly in the vulgate form 58:21 partly in the vetis latina partly even in a version of his own varying from all known traditions 58:28 rulings of councils decreedless sources of roman law the germanic codes capitularies 58:36 penitentials writings and letters of fathers of the church bishops and private persons 58:41 the edict des recta fide of emperor justinian the first the constitutum constantini the liber 58:48 pontificalis and rules of monastic orders he used very few of these sources 58:54 in their original form end quote now it should be noted that davenport 59:00 writing in 1916 thought the forgeries had minimal influence upon the papacy 59:06 he states quote briefly the movement in the roman church towards universal primacy 59:11 was never due to the false decreedles because it was already making way before they came to rome 59:17 the false decreedles merely served as a fortuitous confirmation of certain of the papal principles 59:22 it was not till the latter half of the 11th century that they were openly welcomed the bishops of rome in the 10th treated 59:29 them with no little reserve end quote but is this actually true 59:35 according to furman quote the false decreedles appear to have reached rome and the papacy during the pontificate of 59:42 nicholas the first probably in a.d or 864 59:47 end quote we can actually see the gradual influence of pseudo-izadore 59:52 over pope nicholas the first case in point in 858 some bishops suspicious of a letter by 59:59 pope melchiotis in pseudo-izadore wrote to pope nicholas asking him for the full text of said letter 1:00:05 as it pertained to a case in which they desired to depose bishop hermann of nevers for insanity 1:00:12 nicholas responds but ignores the topic of the letter of melchiotis indicating he probably did not know 1:00:17 about it but was trying to save face fast-forward four years when bishop rotha the second of swa-song 1:00:24 appealed to pope nicholas the first after being deposed by hinkmar of reams and we suddenly see a series of 1:00:30 clear examples that nicholas had not only received the false decreetals but had embraced them fervently nicholas 1:00:38 responds to the frankish bishops using pseudo-izadori to explain that they were not allowed to depose a bishop without 1:00:44 first asking rome this theme appears again in the photian schism when pope nicholas claims 1:00:50 saint ignatius could not be deposed without the permission of the pope and that the pope could reopen any 1:00:56 episcopal trial without appeal this principle is nowhere 1:01:02 in the legitimate canonical literature of the first millennium but it is in pseudo-isidore 1:01:08 and it is repeated by pseudo isidore again and again it might be said that it is the entire 1:01:15 reason for his forgeries now one would be justified to assume 1:01:20 that rotha ii had appealed to rome according to the sardican cannons which allowed deposed clerics to appeal 1:01:27 to the pope who would then decide if said cleric deserved a re-trial and then kick it 1:01:32 back to a provincial synod in a province adjacent to the deposed bishops province but that is not the case in fact 1:01:40 during the proceedings pope nicholas reiterates four oft repeated themes in 1:01:46 pseudo-isadore the first is that at any point during a court case 1:01:52 the bishop on trial can appeal to rome the sardican cannons though make it clear the bishop must already be 1:01:58 deposed to do so second nicholas claims that calling a general counsel was a right only rome 1:02:05 has again this appears nowhere in the genuine canonical sources from the first 1:02:11 millennium as the calling of a general council was usually done by the emperor and in the case of nicea 2 by the 1:02:18 ecumenical patriarch of constantinople the third is that the deposition of 1:02:23 bishops was reserved for the pope again this is a new theme within 1:02:29 pseudo-izadore the fourth point pope nicholas repeats from pseudo-izadore 1:02:34 is that bishops can keep all of their property and their position until judgment is given by rome in the 1:02:40 sardican canons the bishop is indeed considered deposed and is no longer the bishop of their sea 1:02:46 but they cannot be replaced until either rome has decided to reject their appeal for retrial 1:02:52 or the re-trial twice finds them guilty of the original offense pope nicholas 1:02:58 never quotes sudo isidore directly but repeatedly alludes to the collection 1:03:04 quote they were those who have persisted in the catholic faith unto the last days of their lives whose 1:03:10 decreetals must always be preserved by the roman church and which the church has rightfully venerated in her archives and old 1:03:17 monuments without doubt nicholas is speaking of the decretals of martyr and professor 1:03:22 popes whose respect he demands in words bordering on a hymn papal decrees from the time of 1:03:28 persecution did not exist in the most widely distributed genuine chronological historical 1:03:34 collections either in the dionysio hadriana or in the hispana 1:03:39 the oldest decretal in either of these is the letter of pope cyrisius to the metropolitan hymerios of taragona 1:03:46 decrees by martyred popes and indeed tote tanta de cretalia statute were to be 1:03:53 found only in the decretal collection of pseudo-izadore end quote in fact midway through that 1:03:59 letter nicholas proclaimed the decretals of the bishop of rome must be received even when they are not 1:04:06 contained in the book of canons quote a question in its own right often posed 1:04:12 is whether pope nicholas himself knew the false decreedles or whether it was the papal librarian 1:04:17 anastasius who introduced the pope to pseudo-isadore as the scribe of the letters in question 1:04:22 or whether anastasius communicated his knowledge of the forgeries to nicholas a decision 1:04:28 in this matter is difficult and it does not contribute much as ernst perils 1:04:33 the editor of the letters of nicholas says the policy of pope nicholas and the writings issued under his name 1:04:40 when taken as a whole form a unity for our question which is the acceptance 1:04:45 of pseudo isidore in rome the significance of the pontificate of nicholas the first consists of the circumstances that the 1:04:52 false decreetals were probably brought to rome then it was essentially more significant that 1:04:57 nicholas's own concept of the church and the mission of the bishop of rome created assumptions that prepared the 1:05:03 way for many of the principles of pseudo-izadore the core of the ecclesiological 1:05:08 consciousness of nicholas the first was the responsibility of the roman bishop for the entire church 1:05:14 the pope is the apostolic sea and this is the ecclesia romana the summary of the universal church the 1:05:22 body is summarized in its head and must follow its direction to document this attitude and his decisions 1:05:28 nicholas did not need to resort to the forgeries but it was precisely due to their congruence with his concepts 1:05:35 that the pseudo-izadorian decretals entered rome not as a stranger but as a confirmation of many of the 1:05:41 papacy's own convictions end quote this lends credence to the idea that not only was nicholas 1:05:47 proposing something novel but that he was quite possibly aware the forgeries were indeed forgeries 1:05:53 but proceeded forward with them seeing that he could justify his own novel claims for jasper and furman the 1:05:59 first documented case of the decretals being known and used in rome was rethought the second's appeal to 1:06:04 pope nicholas in 863 a.d in 864 but as mentioned before 1:06:10 there is an even earlier example of it using identical standards and that is when pope nicholas attempted 1:06:16 to claim universal jurisdiction over episcopal depositions a concept found nowhere else except in 1:06:22 the pseudo-izadorian decretals during the dispute between saint ignatius and saint photius 1:06:28 in his book papal primacy from its origins to the present catholic priest and professor of church 1:06:35 history father klaus schatz writes quote it is certain that a decade or two later 1:06:41 pope nicholas the first knew the false decreedles and made use of them for example his conflict with patriarch 1:06:47 photius end quote in this particular instance we see nicholas write to emperor michael 1:06:53 demanding he send roman delegates to constantinople for the council there in 861 1:06:58 to review the case regarding the deposition of saint ignatius and installment of saint photius in fact 1:07:05 it was pope nicholas's lust for power that was a direct cause of the fodian schism when he 1:07:10 to the surprise and confusion of the eastern prelates disastrously insurgent himself into 1:07:15 constantinople's church politics throughout the history of the church many saints have exhibited 1:07:21 characteristics of hunger for power but ultimately used it for the good of the church such as saint constantine the great or 1:07:28 the emperor saint justinian but pope nicholas's lust for power had no benefit for the church 1:07:34 and perhaps for this reason he was deprived of canonization in the east pope hadrian makes even more allusions 1:07:41 to sudo isadore in a letter concerning a gathering in july 869 a.d in rome 1:07:47 regarding the marriage of king lothar ii two bishops who were deposed and then excommunicated 1:07:53 there are 38 citations to pseudo isidore cataloged that is 38 citations to 1:08:00 forgeries in just one papal letter keep in mind this acceptance and absorption of the 1:08:06 church's greatest forgeries is all going on before and during the fodian schism 1:08:12 when the pope was using pseudo-isidore to attempt to control the east quote it is probably that 1:08:19 hadrian ii in 868 a.d was the first pope to send a pseudo-isidorian work 1:08:25 as an instruction on canonical norms to prevent bishops and brittany from submitting themselves in the future to 1:08:31 secular courts rather than presenting such cases to the metropolitan or the pope he gave the capitul angel romney to 1:08:38 bishop akhtard of nant the accompanying letter to king solomon iii of brittany 1:08:44 was a clear indication of how the secular ruler was to conduct himself in the future end quote further evidence pope hadrian 1:08:51 ii was an enthusiastic user of pseudo-isidore came when quote one bishop had been 1:08:57 translated and another deposed both central pseudo-isadorian themes 1:09:02 the pope approved the transfer and cited a text of pope antaris that a change of bishops could take 1:09:08 place in response to pressing necessity and the desire of the congregation hadrian did not succeed in bringing the 1:09:14 deposition of the bishop under his jurisdiction and he had to accept the autonomy of the west frankish episcopate 1:09:20 end quote pope john viii who was bishop of rome during the pro-photian council 1:09:25 in 879 a.d which annulled the anti-photian synod of 869 was an enthusiastic user of the 1:09:32 decretals quote under pope john viii the pseudo-isadorian decretals 1:09:37 seem to be handled with a certain obviousness in this pope's letters are found some 1:09:42 citations of pseudo-isidore but something else is more important many of the legal concepts 1:09:48 that are formed or stressed in the false decreetals are clearly expressed by john the eighth hence the principle exception is played 1:09:55 upon in a trial the accused and the accuser should be present infamous persons should not be admitted 1:10:02 and the episcopal dignity should not suffer damage as sudo izadori had proclaimed the 1:10:08 equivalency and equal rank of the primate and the patriarch so too john viii proclaimed that 1:10:13 primatibus alius patriarcos novimus apillari this is an obvious reference to 1:10:20 pseudo-anclitus end quote as mentioned earlier pseudo isidore quickly became more popular 1:10:27 than even the collection created under dionysius exeggus and commissioned by pope hormistas 1:10:33 according to furman the reason for this was quote the very breadth of the pseudo-isadorian 1:10:38 decreedles was one reason for their success it is the most extensive collection of canon law arranged in a historical 1:10:45 chronological order end quote he adds to this later when writing quote the false to credel as well as the 1:10:51 capitularies of benedictus levita are presented as supplements to genuine works and they draw 1:10:57 extensively from common sources end quote in short the reasons why pseudo-izadori 1:11:04 became so popular had to do with the ease of use part 5 the gregorian reforms and beyond The Gregorian Reforms and Beyond 1:11:13 after the tumultuous and morally bankrupt reign of pope benedict the ninth reformers within the roman curia began a 1:11:20 long journey towards ending corruption via vastly expanding papal power and jurisdiction 1:11:25 their main goals were the ending of simony clerical marriage and investiture that being the secular 1:11:31 authority handing to the bishop the symbols of their authority this movement typically known as the 1:11:37 gregorian reforms and named after pope gregory vii who reigned as pope from 1073 1:11:42 a.d to 1085 predated gregory vii in fact the first major 1:11:49 example of this was pope leo ix who upon taking office in 1049 immediately held a series of councils in 1:11:56 cologne aachen mainz saxony and reims in which clerical marriage and simony 1:12:02 were condemned when the patriarch of constantinople michael cerullarious 1:12:07 closed down latin churches in constantinople for using unleavened bread leo ix responded by sending a letter to 1:12:14 the byzantine emperor michael the first claiming cereal aryus had no right to do so 1:12:19 and bolstered his claim to his own universal reign by citing a gigantic section of text from the donation of 1:12:26 constantine even leo the ninth emissary cardinal humbert who placed the bowl of excommunication 1:12:33 onto the altar of the agiosophia during liturgy was himself an ardent supporter 1:12:38 of not just the reforms being pushed but the novel theology behind it this is clearly seen 1:12:45 in the work de sancta romana ecclesia by cardinal humbert father klaus schatz a catholic priest 1:12:53 and professor of church history in commenting on this work writes quote what is new here is not the set of 1:13:00 individual elements terms and associations but their ordering and the overall conception 1:13:06 their very concentration and complexity yields a new comprehensive picture in which the roman 1:13:12 church is no longer merely the center and bond of unity but the very source and origin of 1:13:18 all churches primacy has become the central point for understanding what the church is and at the same time the source of 1:13:25 the church's entire life end quote the next clear indication of the mounting reforms were in 1059 a.d 1:13:32 when pope nicholas ii after waging a war against his papal rival benedict the 10th 1:13:37 used the donation of constantine to give richard of aversa to kapua and robert guiscard with sicily appulia 1:13:44 and calabria and did so citing the donation of constantine nicholas ii's successor alexander ii 1:13:52 was another reforming pope and is most notorious for giving the papal blessing to william the conqueror 1:13:58 before his invasion of england in 1066 with william was sent a letter from the 1:14:03 pope to the english hierarchs ordering them to be obedient to the new norman rulers 1:14:08 immediately after the invasion pope alexander ii made his old teacher lon frank of beck 1:14:15 the new archbishop of canterbury it was lon frank of beck who in his role 1:14:20 as archbishop of canterbury introduced the pseudo-isadorian de creedels into england 1:14:25 there's no solid evidence of them in the british isles prior to lon frank taking up the primatial sea 1:14:31 in england with the death of alexander ii hildebrand of savannah was elected pope 1:14:37 in 1073 a.d and became known as gregory vii and it is to him that the appellative gregorian 1:14:44 reforms is typically attributed now gregory vii was not a newcomer to 1:14:50 the reform movement he had been closely associated with its members from his first years as a monk 1:14:55 in fact when leo ix was elected pope in his entourage that came to rum was 1:15:01 hildebrand hildebrand was also the head of the delegation to mainz that obtained 1:15:06 the election of pope victor ii while still the archbishop of milan and prior 1:15:11 to his election as pope alexander ii worked closely with both peter damien and hildebrand to end 1:15:17 simony and clerical marriage hildebrand despite being outside of rome on diplomatic work at the time of the 1:15:23 election was a key player in nicholas ii being named pope over and against his papal rival 1:15:29 benedict the ninth moreover when nicholas ii invested guisecard and aversa 1:15:35 with various territories in southern italy citing the donation of constantine hildebrand was present with him so 1:15:43 it should be stressed that hildebrand was very much an insider and very much involved with 1:15:49 several previous popes who were pushing the western church in a very specific direction 1:15:54 based largely on forgeries the difference between those previous popes and hildebrand 1:15:59 now gregory vii was how he packaged it and presented it father klaus schatz states quote 1:16:07 this is especially evident in gregory vii's conception of papal primacy an aggressive and compact expression of 1:16:14 his consciousness of his papal power appears in his didactus pape of 1075 a.d this document became a 1:16:21 virtually unrivaled symbol of a papacy whose claim to sovereign power caused it 1:16:26 practically speaking to appear as a replacement for christ in fact it inevitably produces this 1:16:33 impression on the reader the underlying tone of the entire document emerges in the statement 1:16:38 that the pope alone can do everything in the church without him nothing can be validly or 1:16:44 legally done there appear to be absolutely no limits to papal authority end quote 1:16:52 it should be noted that they came to this conclusion due to an imagined past forged 1:17:00 out of forgeries the increased usage of pseudo-izadore 1:17:05 usually via other canonical collections which in turn pass the forgeries onto other collections and so on 1:17:11 is evidence of this as noted earlier pseudo-izadore attempted to create an 1:17:17 imagined golden age in the past to which the contemporary church should aim for 1:17:22 the famous didactus pape of gregory vii a document broken into 27 titles 24 of 1:17:29 which focus on the papacy contains numerous borrowings and allusions to forgeries 1:17:34 titles 3 13 14 20 21 24 and 1:17:41 25 are direct borrowings or allusions to points in pseudo-isidore 1:17:46 while titles 8 9 11 12 22 26 1:17:53 and 27 are either directly or loosely from the donation of constantine the 1:17:59 same for titles 18 19 and 23 being from the samakian forgeries 1:18:05 in all at least 17 of the 27 titles are derived from forgeries so key were 1:18:12 forgeries for this that not only were the donation of constantine and pseudo-izadora used 1:18:17 but also pseudo-semakus you will recall that the statement quote the first c is judged by no one 1:18:25 end quote takes its root in the samakian forgeries that phrase shows up in the didactus 1:18:32 pape of gregory vii father klaus schatz notes quote 1:18:37 the peculiar statement about the holiness of the papal office by which the roman pontiff indubitably 1:18:43 becomes holy through the merits of blessed peter has been given widely differing interpretations 1:18:49 it first appears in the work of bishop enodius of pavia around 502 a.d in the context of the 1:18:55 controversies surrounding pope zamakas and the statement prima cedes anemone 1:19:01 you decatur anodius took simakis aside and declared that the pope could not be judged 1:19:06 because he had received peter's holiness along with his office end quote that along with material from 1:19:14 the donation of constantine was then fed into pseudo-isidore which in turn was fed into the major canonical 1:19:20 collections of the time we see this build up early on in the 890s with the collectio and zelmo 1:19:26 dedicata which has 1980 chapters and 507 1:19:31 are from pseudo-izadore in 1023 a.d we see the decree tomb of birchard of 1:19:36 worms which contains 1785 chapters and 141 are from pseudo-isidore 1:19:44 evo of shaatra who died in 1115 a.d wrote both the decretum and panormia and 1:19:50 of the 3 500 chapters 375 are from pseudo-isadore an immensely 1:19:58 important canonical collection during the gregorian reforms known as the sorum partum sentiente 1:20:05 has 315 titles and 124 were from pseudo-isadore the anonymous 1:20:12 but highly influential canonical collection known as the collection in 74 titles 1:20:17 compiled between 1050 a.d and 1075 is yet another the very first of the 74 1:20:24 chapters is dedicated to the supremacy of rome and provides 20 papal decretals concerning it but 8 1:20:31 of those 20 chapters are forgeries from the pseudo-isidore de credels the prolific canonist and nephew of pope 1:20:37 alexander ii anzelm the younger of lucca compiled the 12-volume work collect yo-kanan 1:20:44 between the years 1081 a.d and 1086 the first volume of which is completely 1:20:49 dedicated to roman supremacy but overall of the 1149 chapters in his 1:20:55 multi-volume work at least 264 chapters are taken directly 1:21:00 from pseudo-izadore likewise the collection of de ustedite has 1173 titles 1:21:07 and 143 are from pseudo-izadore because of this pope john the 19th and 1:21:14 benedict ix used pseudo-izadori specifically but were far outpaced by pope urban ii 1:21:20 who simply went crazy with them and it did not stop there either by the mid 12th century the topic 1:21:27 of canon law had become so dispersed and difficult to keep track of that a monastic jurist named gratian 1:21:33 organized the then current canons into what became known as the concordia discordantium canonum or 1:21:40 harmony of discordant canons due to the fact it attempted to harmonize contradictory 1:21:46 canons while providing commentary on them it is known more commonly as the 1:21:51 decretum it with five other texts is an integral part of the corpus 1:21:56 juris canonici and it too was infiltrated by forgeries 1:22:02 the decree tomb quotes popes who lived in the first four centuries 324 times and at least 1:22:09 313 of those quotations are from forged letters found in 1:22:15 pseudo-izadore nearly 97 of the quotations from popes 1:22:20 up until the year 400 a.d are completely made up the famous catholic priest and 1:22:26 professor of church history ignorance von dollinger in his work the pope and the council writes 1:22:32 quote the most potent instrument of the new papal system was gratian's decretum 1:22:37 which issued about the middle of the 12th century from the first school of law in europe the juristic teacher of the whole of 1:22:43 western christendom bologna in this work the isadorian forgeries were combined with those of the other 1:22:49 gregorian writers and with gratian's own additions his work displaced 1:22:55 all the older collections of canon law and became the manual and repertory not for canonists only but for the 1:23:01 scholastic theologians who for the most part derived all their knowledge of fathers and counsels 1:23:07 from it no book has ever come near in its influence in the church although there is scarcely another so 1:23:14 chock full of gross errors both intentional and unintentional end quote Aquinas, Florence and Beyond 1:23:20 part 6 aquinas florence and beyond even thomas aquinas who has 1:23:27 praised for his studiousness fell victim to them in a work he composed in 1264 a.d 1:23:33 known as against the errors of the greeks aquinas used a floralegium of quotations 1:23:39 on the papacy composed by nicholas of cotrone and given to him by pope urban iv the 1:23:45 problem is almost all of the quotations are forgeries linked in the video description below 1:23:51 is an online copy of the work and sadly hardly any of the citations can be 1:23:56 traced back to legitimate sources roman catholic apologist james lacutus 1:24:01 though claims that for every one that was a forgery there are quote ten real ones end quote 1:24:07 that begs the question of where those ten real ones were when aquinas was attempting to prove the 1:24:13 papacy to the eastern orthodox why didn't he use those supposed real ones and why did he have to resort to 1:24:19 forgeries if it was already so clearly within the church fathers the reason is the crystal clear proofs 1:24:26 he needed were not available in legitimate quotations so he had to resort to fallacious sources 1:24:33 jean-pierre tyrell who wrote a multi-volume work entitled saint thomas aquinas the person and his 1:24:39 work writes that quote this floralegium interested thomas even though it was not critical enough 1:24:46 used doubtful attributions and amplified text with the personal glosses of the compiler 1:24:51 who bent the text in the direction of latin theology but owing to an ah priori confidence in 1:24:57 the greek father's teachings and matters of faith thomas abstained from contradicting them 1:25:02 and sought rather to detach the true doctrinal content from the sometimes doubtful assertions 1:25:08 the second part is unhappily compromised by its own priori confidence in the text 1:25:14 examining it more closely on four specific questions concerning the procession offilio 1:25:19 the primacy of the pope the eucharistic celebration with unleavened bread and purgatory thomas is clearly forced 1:25:26 to rely more on the texts that are closer to latin theology when in fact these are often only glosses foreign to 1:25:34 the fathers end quote marcus plusted the author of the book orthodox readings of aquinas 1:25:40 points out quote the contra errors grecorum is not as might appear from the title a 1:25:46 systematic treatise by thomas on the question it is rather thomas's expert opinion on 1:25:52 a rather poor collection of texts many of which are distorted or of dubious authenticity 1:25:58 produced by nicolas of catrone a native of what is now duras in albania nicholas a unionist 1:26:05 bishop produced the collection at the request of the emperor theodore lascaris 1:26:10 very likely he drew on earlier floralegia pope urban iv requested thomas's 1:26:16 judgment on the lybellas de fide sancte trinitatis about which he evidently harbored 1:26:22 suspicions it is much to be regretted that thomas did not exercise his customary care 1:26:27 for the accuracy of his sources in analyzing this tawdry work it may be that he took such a task to be 1:26:33 outside his brief end quote as a side note prior to giving that floralegium to aquinas 1:26:40 pope urban iv had used it when writing to byzantine emperor michael paleologus in an attempt to 1:26:46 convert him to catholicism but the influence of the forgeries did not end there 1:26:52 to cite ignorance von dollinger quote from the beginning of the 14th century 1:26:57 the spurious passages of saint cyril and forged canons of councils maintained their ground 1:27:02 being guaranteed against all suspicion by the authority of saint thomas but then the contest between the council 1:27:08 of basel and pope eugenius iv evoked the work of cardinal torkamata besides some others of less importance 1:27:16 torquamata's argument which was held up to the time of bellarmine to be the most conclusive apology of the papal system 1:27:23 rests entirely on fabrications later than the pseudo-izadore and chiefly on the spurious passages of 1:27:30 saint cyril the pope is infallible all authority of other bishops is borrowed or derived 1:27:37 from his decisions of councils without his ascent are null and void these fundamental principles of 1:27:44 torquemada are proved by spurious passages of anacletus clement the council of calcium saint 1:27:51 cyril and a mass of forged or adulterated testimonies in the times of leo the 10th and 1:27:57 plymouth iii the cardinals thomas avio or kajatan and jacobazi followed closely 1:28:03 in his footsteps melchior canoes built firmly on the authority of cyril attested by saint thomas and so did 1:28:10 bellarmine and the jesuits who followed him end quote forgeries again become key at the 1:28:16 council of florence where saint mark of ephesus often maligned for claiming the catholics were using forgeries 1:28:23 has ultimately been proven right catholic priest and head of saint cyril and methodius 1:28:28 byzantine catholic seminary father christian kappas writes quote 1:28:33 though there was no way to produce critical additions at the time the conflicts served to entrench mark in 1:28:39 his theological interpretation of the filioque and ultimately led to a general suspicion of all the latin patristic 1:28:46 authorities unavailable in greek in fact the second leading orator basarian 1:28:51 was only one over to the latin side through the citation of a spurious text attributed to the 1:28:57 authority of a fourth century pope end quote catholic apologists will often 1:29:02 times claim besserian's entire conversion to catholicism was due to a supposed unified witness of 1:29:08 church fathers east and west but father kappas a scholar is saying quite the opposite 1:29:14 he is pointing out it was a forgery that caused bisarian to give in to rome in the same paper father kappus also 1:29:21 points out that quote mark's suspicions of latin scholarship were also justified by 1:29:27 arguments of cardinal julian cesarini who claimed the addition of the filioque permissible 1:29:32 on the authority of an earlier pope alas it was this that proved to be the 1:29:38 turning point in the debate with the greeks the argument was made that because post-nicene popes added to 1:29:44 the creed this allowed for further innovations the greeks knew of no such text and were utterly 1:29:50 demoralized by supposed authenticity as it turned out the text was a fake end quote 1:29:58 what father kappus a catholic priest and scholar of church history in eastern christianity is saying 1:30:04 is it was forgeries that did it the merits of the catholic case were not defensible when based on legitimate 1:30:11 texts and so fallacious sources had to be resorted to the issue though is not simply the 1:30:17 removal of such texts and then everything goes back to normal but that catholic canon law and theology has been 1:30:23 built around the lens that these forgeries created in other words the catholic 1:30:29 church at least on a dogmatic level views legitimate sources through the lens 1:30:34 created by the illegitimate sources so simply removing the forgeries is not enough it would require a revamping of 1:30:41 their paradigm despite that one glaring forgery is still there in the catholic code of 1:30:47 canon law and is taken directly from the samakian forgeries quote the first c is judged by no one end 1:30:55 quote one must ask if this were truly found in legitimate canonical sources 1:31:02 why would they need to resort to the quotation of a known forgery 1:31:08 this concludes the second half of forged by forgeries the road to the great schism we here at 1:31:15 ubi petrus want to thank you our generous patreon subscribers for your support 1:31:20 it is because of your support that we will be able to continue to produce videos with content such as this 1:31:26 and at much more frequent intervals
Leave a Comment